Overview
Different LLM models have different strengths for coding tasks. This comparison covers the major models available in 2025-2026 and their relative strengths for various programming tasks.
Model Comparison
| Model | Context | Best For | Available In |
|---|---|---|---|
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 200K | Large codebases, careful reasoning | Claude Code, Cursor, API |
| GPT-4o | 128K | Multi-turn conversation, broad knowledge | Copilot, Cursor, ChatGPT, API |
| Gemini 1.5 Pro | 1M+ | Massive context, multimodal | AI Studio, select editors, API |
| DeepSeek Coder V2 | 128K | Code completion, self-hosting | Open-source, Ollama |
| Llama 3.1 405B | 128K | Self-hosted, privacy, fine-tuning | Open-source, Ollama, API |
Claude (Anthropic)
Strong at: large codebase understanding, careful reasoning, following complex instructions, and long-form code generation. 200K token context window. Available via API, Claude Code CLI, and integrated in Cursor. Best choice for complex refactoring and multi-file tasks.
GPT-4 / o1 (OpenAI)
Strong at: multi-turn conversations, broad knowledge, and tool use. o1 models add explicit chain-of-thought reasoning for complex logic. Available via API, ChatGPT, GitHub Copilot, and Cursor.
Open-Source LLMs
DeepSeek Coder V2
Excellent code completion and generation. 128K context. Strong performance for an open model.
Llama 3.1
Meta's open LLM. Available in 8B, 70B, and 405B sizes. Good for self-hosted coding assistance.
CodeLlama
Code-specialized Llama variant. Optimized for code completion, infilling, and instruction following.
StarCoder 2
Trained on The Stack v2. Strong at code completion across many languages. Good for fine-tuning.